Effects of a 360° virtual counselling environment on patient anxiety and CCTA process time: A randomised controlled trial
Paalimäki-Paakki, Karoliina; Virtanen, Mari; Henner, Anja; Vähänikkilä, Hannu; Nieminen, Miika T.; Schroderus-Salo, Tanja; Kääriäinen, Maria (2022)
Elsevier
2022
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022102563240
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022102563240
Tiivistelmä
Introduction
This study investigated whether a 360° virtual counselling environment (360°VCE) was more effective at decreasing patients' anxiety than routine standard of care counselling for patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and if there was any difference in the process times for both of these groups.
Methods
A total of 86 patients underwent CCTA in this randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The 360°VCE was developed using spherical panoramic images and non-immersive 360° technology. The primary outcome, anxiety, was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The secondary outcome, CCTA process time, was measured from the time of arrival in the department until end of examination.
Results
Pre-scan anxiety was lower among patients in the 360°VCE group immediately before CCTA in comparison to patients in the control group (p = 0.015). Women demonstrated higher levels of anxiety than men in both groups. No between-group differences were discerned in CCTA process time.
Conclusion
Access to 360°VCE can reduce patients’ pre-CCTA anxiety levels.
Implications for practice
The presented results can be used to improve patient counselling and care, reduce anxiety among patients undergoing CCTA, and optimise the CCTA examination procedure.
This study investigated whether a 360° virtual counselling environment (360°VCE) was more effective at decreasing patients' anxiety than routine standard of care counselling for patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and if there was any difference in the process times for both of these groups.
Methods
A total of 86 patients underwent CCTA in this randomised controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. The 360°VCE was developed using spherical panoramic images and non-immersive 360° technology. The primary outcome, anxiety, was measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). The secondary outcome, CCTA process time, was measured from the time of arrival in the department until end of examination.
Results
Pre-scan anxiety was lower among patients in the 360°VCE group immediately before CCTA in comparison to patients in the control group (p = 0.015). Women demonstrated higher levels of anxiety than men in both groups. No between-group differences were discerned in CCTA process time.
Conclusion
Access to 360°VCE can reduce patients’ pre-CCTA anxiety levels.
Implications for practice
The presented results can be used to improve patient counselling and care, reduce anxiety among patients undergoing CCTA, and optimise the CCTA examination procedure.