LEADERSHIP IN BUSINESS : Organizing a local oenological event
Arevalo, Alexis (2018)
Centria-ammattikorkeakoulu
2018
All rights reserved
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-201805087038
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-201805087038
Tiivistelmä
The analysis about the behavior of a leader was made to carry out a project in the city of Kokkola in Finland. This event was an oenological event. Proposed by 4 students from the Centria school, this event aimed to make discover to the inhabitants of the city of Kokkola a new vision of French wines. We needed a partnership with a Finnish structure helping us manage the organization. Indeed, the legal aspect was a barrier for us because we did not have the required licenses.
The main topic was to interview two leaders of daily life. Then it was necessary to analyze their vision of things and how they behave in their respective companies. Two styles of leadership had emerged, the paternalistic style and the directive style. Our team analyzed this and then implemented the elements to revive the preparation of the event that was organized.
The most interesting element was to understand how the modifications affected the motivation as well as the satisfaction of our team. Then another peculiarity came out, it was that the changes led to other of itself.
It was necessary to do an analysis before and after the application of the changes to realize the real importance of good leadership. We were able to conclude that several major lines emerged from this. First of all, there was a relationship in leadership and motivation and satisfaction. Then that different leadership had a direct relationship with the task and the team. Finally, some style of leadership came from them.
The main topic was to interview two leaders of daily life. Then it was necessary to analyze their vision of things and how they behave in their respective companies. Two styles of leadership had emerged, the paternalistic style and the directive style. Our team analyzed this and then implemented the elements to revive the preparation of the event that was organized.
The most interesting element was to understand how the modifications affected the motivation as well as the satisfaction of our team. Then another peculiarity came out, it was that the changes led to other of itself.
It was necessary to do an analysis before and after the application of the changes to realize the real importance of good leadership. We were able to conclude that several major lines emerged from this. First of all, there was a relationship in leadership and motivation and satisfaction. Then that different leadership had a direct relationship with the task and the team. Finally, some style of leadership came from them.