Comparing the Blue Ribbon Foundation Group strategy and effectiveness with the strategy of international actors operating on the Housing First principle
Kuusiniemi, Teresa (2024)
2024
All rights reserved. This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-202405069308
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-202405069308
Tiivistelmä
The objective of the thesis was to find strategies that were considered good for the case organization to benchmark. This thesis examines strategies for addressing homelessness. The aim was to find the strengths of the strategy that could be utilized in future operations of the organization. The thesis provides a combination of tools to analyze the strategies and find the components that can be used to plan future strategies. The results of this thesis provide information to the case organization to complement their strategy work.
The theory of this thesis was based on strategy, benchmarking, and two strategy tools: kernel tool and SWOT analysis. The framework was developed specifically from the point of view of non-profit organizations. Qualitative methods were used to analyze the data in this thesis. Data was collected from the web pages of the organizations. Data was analyzed by using qualitative content analysis.
This thesis shows that it is possible to find good strategies and positive factors to benchmark by combining two different analyzing tools. There were a lot of similarities in the strategies, and the small nuances of the differences still set them apart. While the study didn't examine the case company's strategy in detail, it uncovered similarities with successful strategic practices. The study highlights the importance of aligning strategies with organizational values and mission.
The theory of this thesis was based on strategy, benchmarking, and two strategy tools: kernel tool and SWOT analysis. The framework was developed specifically from the point of view of non-profit organizations. Qualitative methods were used to analyze the data in this thesis. Data was collected from the web pages of the organizations. Data was analyzed by using qualitative content analysis.
This thesis shows that it is possible to find good strategies and positive factors to benchmark by combining two different analyzing tools. There were a lot of similarities in the strategies, and the small nuances of the differences still set them apart. While the study didn't examine the case company's strategy in detail, it uncovered similarities with successful strategic practices. The study highlights the importance of aligning strategies with organizational values and mission.