An analysis of the relation between companies and candidates during the recruitment process

Abstract

Recruitment is the backbone of any business. The two key players in this principle are recruiters, of course, but also candidates. The relationship between these two entities is complex, and constantly evolving. The balance of power in the recruitment process may seem obvious to some, less so to others. But these are not fixed and change over time.

These changes have given rise to new concepts in the world of human resources. While applying marketing principles to recruitment might have seemed unreasonable some time ago, today it's one of the trends the market is taking, to adapt to the needs of both candidates and recruiters. But just what are these needs? What do recruiters think of candidates, and vice versa? Are there any differences in the relationship between in-house and external recruiters? The aim of these questions is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between candidates and recruiters during the recruitment process.

To answer these questions, the authors conducted several studies, including interviews with recruiters, both in-house and external, with open-ended questions, and a more global survey of candidates. Combined with an in-depth theoretical study, these surveys enabled us to arrive at the following conclusions. Candidates have gained space in the relationship, which has balanced it. However, these exchanges are not yet perfect, and both candidates and recruiters have recommendations. Both parties would like to see more transparency and questioning, in order to achieve a good balance and a healthy, fair process.