ME-C two stroke slow speed engines : Case Study Finneco Class vessels

Abstract

This research aimed to collect engineering crew feedback to understand how two-stroke ME-C electronically controlled engines, installed on the Finneco Class vessel, have been performing. To ensure no downtime in the vessel's commercial operation because of breakdowns of the main engines, it is necessary that all factors influencing the “process” of efficient working conditions of the “prime mover” are analysed so that continuous process improvement is constantly implemented. Earlier studies have shown that damages to main engines are caused by mistakes in operation, lack of training, lack of spare parts and maintenance, poor documentation, and lack of good support functions. The engineering crew as frontline workers are the main actors of the process, and they have the unique “know-how” to give valuable inputs for continuous improvement. The research, through a survey questionnaire answered by 23 participants from Finneco class vessels (response rate 74%), including all the Chief and First Engineers, has explored and analysed the crew experience with ME-C 2-stroke engines and identified the “threats” and “opportunities” that this modern technology has posed during the last 2 and a half years of operation. The study has shown that the electronically controlled 2-stroke engines have been an excellent choice, they have been reliable in the operation, and the crew have operated and maintained the engine according to the “best practices." Training gap was found especially for the newer crew, but thanks to knowledge sharing, cascade training, and the “power of the internet,” where seafarers share experiences and "know-how,” the gap was filled. The research has revealed difficulties in getting qualified support for ME-C engines in Finland because 2-stroke engines are not common for Finnish-flag ships. Procuring spare parts is challenging and requires a proactive and well-planned approach.