Evaluating circularity metrics on industrial lifting equipment
Salonen, Niko (2025)
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-202502112628
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-202502112628
Tiivistelmä
The increasing focus on climate change mitigation, resource conservation, and
sustainability has placed industrial equipment and activities under scrutiny due to
their significant shares of emissions and resource use. Manufacturing industries
can address these challenges and ensure current and future regulatory
compliance by adopting circular economy strategies and improving products’
end-of-life management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the
reusability and recyclability rates of industrial lifting equipment and to assess the
feasibility of such metrics for circularity measurement.
Qualitative methods were used to conduct a comprehensive literature review and
expert interviews to determine the current knowledge base and gaps in circularity
and end-of-life management of industrial lifting equipment. A systematic review
searched applicable standards and industry guidelines, and quantification
methods were developed based on these standards. A case study assessed the
calculation methods for circularity metrics reusability and recyclability on an
example product.
Reusability and recyclability can be quantified with mass-fraction calculations
adapted from recyclability rate calculation standards, and this method is
applicable for circularity measurement. The results show that more extensive
dismantling prior to recycling can improve the functional recycling rate on both
material and product level. The value of several high-value parts could be
retained via reuse and other value retention processes instead of recycling.
Adopting circular economy strategies can reduce waste generation and provide
reusable parts for an aftermarket, reducing the need for primary material use.
Scarcity of reliable data has a significant impact on the validity of calculation
results, and the lack of standardized product-group specific recyclability and
reusability assessment guidelines inhibits reliable comparison of products based
on these metrics. The findings may expand the existing body of knowledge on
circularity potential in industrial lifting equipment and can inform industry
stakeholders about potential focal points for improving product recyclability and
reusability. By identifying the current challenges and opportunities in product end-of-life management, this research can help guide future innovations in product
design and development. Further research is needed to address the economic
aspects and business models required for large scale implementation.
sustainability has placed industrial equipment and activities under scrutiny due to
their significant shares of emissions and resource use. Manufacturing industries
can address these challenges and ensure current and future regulatory
compliance by adopting circular economy strategies and improving products’
end-of-life management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the
reusability and recyclability rates of industrial lifting equipment and to assess the
feasibility of such metrics for circularity measurement.
Qualitative methods were used to conduct a comprehensive literature review and
expert interviews to determine the current knowledge base and gaps in circularity
and end-of-life management of industrial lifting equipment. A systematic review
searched applicable standards and industry guidelines, and quantification
methods were developed based on these standards. A case study assessed the
calculation methods for circularity metrics reusability and recyclability on an
example product.
Reusability and recyclability can be quantified with mass-fraction calculations
adapted from recyclability rate calculation standards, and this method is
applicable for circularity measurement. The results show that more extensive
dismantling prior to recycling can improve the functional recycling rate on both
material and product level. The value of several high-value parts could be
retained via reuse and other value retention processes instead of recycling.
Adopting circular economy strategies can reduce waste generation and provide
reusable parts for an aftermarket, reducing the need for primary material use.
Scarcity of reliable data has a significant impact on the validity of calculation
results, and the lack of standardized product-group specific recyclability and
reusability assessment guidelines inhibits reliable comparison of products based
on these metrics. The findings may expand the existing body of knowledge on
circularity potential in industrial lifting equipment and can inform industry
stakeholders about potential focal points for improving product recyclability and
reusability. By identifying the current challenges and opportunities in product end-of-life management, this research can help guide future innovations in product
design and development. Further research is needed to address the economic
aspects and business models required for large scale implementation.
