Hyppää sisältöön
    • Suomeksi
    • På svenska
    • In English
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • English
  • Kirjaudu
Hakuohjeet
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Näytä viite 
  •   Ammattikorkeakoulut
  • Kaakkois-Suomen ammattikorkeakoulu
  • Opinnäytetyöt
  • Näytä viite
  •   Ammattikorkeakoulut
  • Kaakkois-Suomen ammattikorkeakoulu
  • Opinnäytetyöt
  • Näytä viite

Management of Women's Pain During Standard Gynaecological Procedures

Cruickshank, Sara Anne (2025)

 
Avaa tiedosto
Cruickshank_Sara.pdf (1013.Kt)
Lataukset: 


Cruickshank, Sara Anne
2025
All rights reserved. This publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedot
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-202602042255
Tiivistelmä
This literature review examines the management of women’s pain during standard gynaecological procedures, specifically concerning pap smears, hysteroscopies, and intrauterine contraception (IUD) insertion. Social media contains multiple reports of women experiencing painful or uncomfortable gynaecological appointments. These reports highlight the need to evaluate how pain is discussed and managed for such procedures. The study focused on two main areas. Firstly, how patients were advised regarding pain and their pain management. Secondly, how procedural pain is dealt with according to existing evidence.
A total of 15 research articles were used in a qualitative analysis, specifically a descriptive literature review. Articles were chosen using a range of key words and set time frame. The results were then filtered to a small and most relevant selection.
Key findings indicate that in-spite of clear evidence-based guidelines, women are still poorly informed regarding pain management options. Patients are receiving minimal or ineffective analgesia. It is still commonly recommended that women take ibuprofen in advance of a procedure, despite clinical evidence proving it to be ineffective for gynaecological procedural pain.
Health care providers are not adequately communicating with patients regarding procedures or discussions on pain management. The communication has been described as inadequate, forcing women to turn to social media for knowledge and advice. Increased use of social media also correlates to a pattern of increased anxiety and pain.
In conclusion attitudes towards women’s pain management need to change. Clinicians need to consistently use appropriate analgesia as recommended in guidelines. Communication between the patient and clinician needs to be improved. These aspects, in turn, can lead to a reduction in procedural pain and improved patient experiences.
Kokoelmat
  • Opinnäytetyöt
Ammattikorkeakoulujen opinnäytetyöt ja julkaisut
Yhteydenotto | Tietoa käyttöoikeuksista | Tietosuojailmoitus | Saavutettavuusseloste
 

Selaa kokoelmaa

NimekkeetTekijätJulkaisuajatKoulutusalatAsiasanatUusimmatKokoelmat

Henkilökunnalle

Ammattikorkeakoulujen opinnäytetyöt ja julkaisut
Yhteydenotto | Tietoa käyttöoikeuksista | Tietosuojailmoitus | Saavutettavuusseloste