Virtualization-Based Fault-Tolerance
Devinani, Jagan (2011)
Metropolia Ammattikorkeakoulu
2011
All rights reserved
Julkaisun pysyvä osoite on
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2011060310918
https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2011060310918
Tiivistelmä
This thesis presents an evaluation of the Virtualization-Based Fault Tolerance solutions and approaches available from different vendors.
The performance of a SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) based application among “native environment”, “virtual environment” and “virtual environment with fault-tolerance feature turned on” are compared.
The experiment was carried out with “VMWare ESXi” as the virtualization layer and “VMWare vSphere” as the management client to administer the “VMWare ESXi” platform.
The experiment was carried out in a client-server model with UAC (User Agent Client) acting as the SIP client and SUT (System Under Test) as the SIP server. The “IMS-Bench SIPp” software was used in UAC and the “opensips” software was used in the SUT.
The results obtained from the experiments carried out in the three different environments are compared with respect to the SAPS (Scenario Attempts Per Seconds). The SAPS in “native environment” are one hundred and thirty nine, in “virtual environment” are one hundred and in “virtual environment with fault-tolerance feature turned on” are thirty four.
The performance of a SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) based application among “native environment”, “virtual environment” and “virtual environment with fault-tolerance feature turned on” are compared.
The experiment was carried out with “VMWare ESXi” as the virtualization layer and “VMWare vSphere” as the management client to administer the “VMWare ESXi” platform.
The experiment was carried out in a client-server model with UAC (User Agent Client) acting as the SIP client and SUT (System Under Test) as the SIP server. The “IMS-Bench SIPp” software was used in UAC and the “opensips” software was used in the SUT.
The results obtained from the experiments carried out in the three different environments are compared with respect to the SAPS (Scenario Attempts Per Seconds). The SAPS in “native environment” are one hundred and thirty nine, in “virtual environment” are one hundred and in “virtual environment with fault-tolerance feature turned on” are thirty four.